|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
Liang Nuren
|
Posted - 2011.05.27 23:30:00 -
[1]
Boost the **** out of its cap recharge and remote repair amount bonus. Remove tackle immunity (while keeping ewar immunity). Make it dockable, nerf the **** out of its HP, fighter drone bay, and reduce build cost.
Viola! Its the best SC! :)
-Liang -- Eve Forum ***** Extraordinaire On Twitter
|
Liang Nuren
|
Posted - 2011.06.07 21:42:00 -
[2]
Originally by: Mastah Mazoku So CCP, can you give us a word about balancing the supercarrier pretty please ? After a year you could at least tell all the HEL owners that you are at minimum looking at the thing ?! No ?
They have said they're looking at them. But probably not in the way you want. -- Eve Forum ***** Extraordinaire On Twitter
|
Liang Nuren
|
Posted - 2011.06.07 22:14:00 -
[3]
They've made no secret of the fact Supercarriers are under the nerf hammer next (one of many comments): http://www.eveonline.com/ingameboard.asp?a=topic&threadID=1508537&page=1#26 -- Eve Forum ***** Extraordinaire On Twitter
|
Liang Nuren
|
Posted - 2011.06.07 23:53:00 -
[4]
Originally by: Kastsumi Kobayariel It's very likely that this nerf will take the form of nerfed jump range or include some sort of cyno spool up mechanic.
It seems that there's a lot of information out there right now: - CCP is unhappy with all capital projection. This implies cyno spool up time and/or nerfed jump range. - The players (and CCP) is unhappy with supercap blobs being effectively invulnerable from attack without an even bigger blobs of supercaps. This implies a strong nerf to the combat strength of supercarriers at the very minimum - potentially separating out the fighter bomber bay from a small/non-existent fighter/drone bay, decreased EHP/tank, and other nasty nerfs.
-Liang -- Eve Forum ***** Extraordinaire On Twitter
|
Liang Nuren
|
Posted - 2011.06.08 00:26:00 -
[5]
Originally by: Kastsumi Kobayariel
Originally by: Liang Nuren This implies a strong nerf to the combat strength of supercarriers at the very minimum
Those nerfs would make sense, I just hope they don't drastically lower FB DPS without altering sov structures' HP at the same time, because god damn some of that grinding is horrendous even now.
I could get behind that! -- Eve Forum ***** Extraordinaire On Twitter
|
Liang Nuren
|
Posted - 2011.06.08 03:46:00 -
[6]
Originally by: Aamrr I'm reasonably certain that nobody would be stupid enough to active tank a SC, even with crystals. I think he's more concerned with correcting a perceived imbalance between armor and shield tanking.
It's one thing if the mechanics of shields (not penalizing speed/agility) don't translate well to capital ships (flying bricks). It's another thing entirely if CCP has decided to deliberately nerf shield tanking capitals "lol just because."
...or such is my perception. As I stated in my last post, I really don't think it would change things much one way or the other if crystals were allowed (slaves are another story).
It wouldn't make a big difference to the Hel, but it'd make a huge difference to the Chimera and Nidhoggur.
-Liang -- Eve Forum ***** Extraordinaire On Twitter
|
|
|
|